Click on the link and read the article below.
Totten presents an interesting perspective. If in fact true, human kind is progressing away from violence. But while talking about warfare and weapons of mass destruction. He fails to mention that mankind continues to develop these weapons that are more destructive and more of a threat to our very existence. So the point really is ... as conflict winds down and the United Nations becomes the United Federation of Planets, any one conflict has much more potential for ending the human race today than in the past.
Michael Totten's point that rightfully justifies is the use of force for "The objective is (or at least should be) making the use of a weapon of mass destruction more costly than not using it, to demonstrate not just to Assad but also to every other would-be war criminal that the norm established in 1993 on behalf of every human being will not go down without a fight. "
This is in part a cold war premise and presumes that you're dealing with a rational opponent that would view the devastation or destruction of his or her nation as counterproductive. The problem is that with the new Rogue regimes and Apocalyptic driven Islam, the concept of a deterrent based on MAD is no longer valid. Violence isn't a means to an end, it is the end in itself !!! North Korea and Iran's leaders are more than willing to send millions of their own people to the hereafter journey.